Once again, Trita Parsi of NIAC has asked for money. As usual,
he presents himself as a genuine defender of peace and frames his critics
(including me Hassan dai) as the stooges of warmongers and neocons who seek the
invasion of our country. Parsi's new writing reveals his true nature and
deceit.
The lawsuit that he and NIAC filed
and finally lost, showed one thing clearly that he lies as easily as we
breath. He and NIAC were punished for these lies and will have to pay several
hundred of thousands of Dollars. They lied to the court, their expert lied (and
disqualified) and their attorney was disbarred. In its ruling, the
court sanctioned NIAC for discovery abuses and untrue declarations to the
court. The judge wrote: "There is no question that plaintiffs have
repeatedly tried to evade their discovery obligations... In awarding sanctions,
the Court is mindful not just of the need to compensate defendant, but also of
the need to deter plaintiffs from future discovery abuses." (Ruling, p.
23)
Now let's study his new declaration and see how he tries to
distort the reality. He gave some of my emails to Eli Clifton a so-called left activists (whom I find an
insult to the real left) and Clifton published a hit
peace against me and MEF. Then, another website close to Parsi, removed my
short declaration, modified the article and published
it. Parsi used this new article in his
campaign to present himself as a victim of warmongers.
Let me explain Parsi's deceit in two parts, first his
campaign to present himself as a peace defender.
Parsi's lobby has always been about business and open up
trade between US and Iran. The peace mantle is just a disguise and human face
for his lobby. In his
letter to his partner and Washington lobbyist he explained the real
nature of his lobby:
"Although the mission of the proposed lobby should
be to improve relations between the US and Iran and open up opportunities for
trade, the initial targets should be less controversial issues such as visas
and racial profiling/discrimination... Despite its predominantly business
oriented constituency, it is essential that the lobby creates a “human face”
for its aims and goals. AIPAC successfully painted the opponents of the Iran
Libya Sanctions Act as “greedy businessmen who had no scruples when it came to
doing business with terrorist regimes.” The oil companies failed to
characterize their campaign with “human concern for the well-being of innocent
Iranians stuck with a dictatorial regime” or “support for the poor mid-Western
family father who lost his job due the sanctions. The human element
is essential both when it comes to attracting support among Iranian-Americans and
when it comes to winning the debate and the votes on the Hill."
The NIAC internal documents released during the lawsuit show
that Mr. Parsi was
working for and being paid by Atieh
Bahar, an Oil consulting company in Tehran with close ties to the
regime. Parsi coordinated
his lobby with Siamak Namazi, who was Atieh Bahar's partner and managing
director.
NIAC and Parsi have continued a joint lobby
with USAEngage representing large US corporation to lift the sanctions against
Iran.
Trita Parsi has used his contact with the Iranian regime's
officials as a business asset. In 2006 after meeting Javad Zarif, the regime's
ambassador to the UN, he launched "Iran negotiation project" for
which he asked nearly $100.000 to be shared with Gareth Porter (another
so-called anti war activists). In an email
explaining his project, Parsi wrote: "Few analysts in Washington have
the access of Dr. Parsi to decision makers in Iran."
Parsi contacted
US politicians and asked them to meet Ahmadinejad's deputy in Europe. He
participated in these secret meetings led by Mojtaba Hashemi Samareh and held
in Europe.
For more clarification about NIAC's lobby, I ask the readers
to study NIAC's
internal documents released by the court and judge by themselves.
Now, a quick response to his allegation that I was coached
by neocons or funded by warmongers to attack NIAC.
I started to investigate about NIAC in 2005-6 after the Jack
Amramoff's
scandal was revealed and Parsi's
boss Bob Ney was indicted and jailed. His boss had received bribes from a
London based arm dealer who tried to buy
a VIP airplane for Khamenei. First time
I contacted Middle East Forum was in August 2008, several years after I started
my reports about NIAC.
NIAC sued me in April 2008 to
break me under financial burdens. I took a lawyer and paid from my own
pocket until I had no more money. I asked for help and in September 2008, MEF
contacted several law firms and Sidley Austin accepted to defend me. Law firms
have a policy to defend pro bono and I was lucky they came forward to defend
me. Timothy kapshandy of
Sidley Austin's Chicago office has been my chief attorney. Michele Obama worked
for Sidley Austin's Chicago office as well.
MEF helped my legal defense and as of today, I have not
received a dime from them. They paid directly to my lawyers for court expenses,
as they have not billed their work.
My email to Michael Rubin (editor of ME Quarterly) was in
December 2008, several years after I had started to write about NIAC and
therefore, he did not coach me to attack NIAC. In fact, I had sent my articles
to MEQ for publication and they refused
to publish it. In response to my request, Rubin explained the MEQ's policy and
what they can publish so that I modify my article. I did not modify it and it
was never published.
Regarding MEF and Sidley Austin's help to my legal defense,
I repeat what I told Eli Clifton:
“I reiterate my deepest gratitude toward MEF and Sidley
Austin for supporting my legal defense. Every American and anyone who seeks
peace and democracy should be grateful to them as their support helped me and
others to confront NIAC’s bullying and we were able to continue writing and
show the deception behind NIAC’s lobby. This lawsuit is a victory for peace
lovers and real progressives whose criticism of American foreign policy do not
turn them into advocates of Tehran rulers.”